For law firms

Why use HIVE instead of an expert directory?

A directory starts with names. HIVE starts with the case, helps determine what expertise is actually needed, and carries the work into a private matter workspace.

From case to next step

01

Upload or describe the case

Begin in a private firm workspace with a simple narrative and only the materials you are authorized to provide.

02

Understand the expertise and options

HIVE identifies likely disciplines, explains uncertainty, and may indicate that consulting review—or no additional expert yet—is the better next step.

03

Select and move forward

Review service scope and price, compare authorized expert information when available, and decide what to order or whom to approach.

Case-first, not directory-first

Upload the Case and begin with the evidence and legal questions, not a list of names.

Confidential Case Review

A private review can clarify whether a testifying expert is needed yet, helping avoid premature spend.

Build the full expert team

HIVE identifies relevant disciplines, sequencing, and where one expert should precede another.

Explainable, availability-aware matching

Recommendations show the supported reasons for fit and account for stated availability.

Expert Vulnerability Review

Examine qualifications, scope, methodology, consistency, and disclosed risks before relying on an expert.

One matter workspace

Keep evidence, Case Intelligence, expert strategy, outreach, responses, and deliverables together.

Concierge Search

When current network supply is insufficient, HIVE opens a documented human-assisted search instead of inventing a match.

No expert-fee markup

Experts set their own professional rates; HIVE takes no commission from those fees.

Start with the evidence.

Create a confidential workspace and upload the case. Automated output remains preliminary and professional judgment stays explicit.

Upload the Case